Difference between revisions of "User talk:Larryliang"
Larryliang (talk | contribs) (→Next generation camera body.) |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Any Idea? | Any Idea? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Larry, | ||
+ | |||
+ | I was (and still am) trying hard to pack components on the board as compact as I can to keep the camera small. So we can think of rearranging internals (and I am working now on connector placement for USB+SATA+ZIF PATA+2*CF+RS-232+trigger I/O), but it all will use the same overall dimensions. We'll probably have to make cameras some 5 mm longer when motorized sensor focus/tilt will be available.--[[User:Andrey.filippov|Andrey.filippov]] 09:46, 27 November 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 07:46, 27 November 2007
Next generation camera body.
I am thinking of developing of new camera body for 10353+10338 board set ( or future CPU board).
current design can't provide enough space for CPU board holder ( you see, the current version ugly and expensive), and optional CF card adaptor,even the 10349 board.
current inside section of body tube is 35.5mm by 38.5mm, I plan to change it to 44mm by 40mm. and the the outside of camera body should not larger than 50mm by 50 mm.
Any Idea?
Larry,
I was (and still am) trying hard to pack components on the board as compact as I can to keep the camera small. So we can think of rearranging internals (and I am working now on connector placement for USB+SATA+ZIF PATA+2*CF+RS-232+trigger I/O), but it all will use the same overall dimensions. We'll probably have to make cameras some 5 mm longer when motorized sensor focus/tilt will be available.--Andrey.filippov 09:46, 27 November 2007 (CST)