Stereo Vision Systems: Difference between revisions

From ElphelWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
Oleg (talk | contribs)
editor
3,732 edits
Oleg (talk | contribs)
editor
3,732 edits
Line 7: Line 7:
==Comparison table==
==Comparison table==
{| class='wikitable'
{| class='wikitable'
!colspan='20' style='text-align:left;color:royalblue'| GENERAL
|-
<!--!style='text-align:left;'|Company
<!--!style='text-align:left;'|Company
| [[File:mnc393-x_sm.jpeg|100px]]
| [[File:mnc393-x_sm.jpeg|100px]]
Line 25: Line 23:
|-
|-
-->
-->
!style='text-align:left;'|Company
!style='text-align:left;'|3D Vision System
| Elphel
| Elphel MNC393-XCAM
| Intel
| Reviewed competing products
| Intel
| StereoLabs
| StereoLabs
| MyntAI
| ZiVID
| Ensenso
| Ensenso
| Nerian
| HTC
| FLIR
| e-con Systems
|-
!style='text-align:left;'|Product
| MNC393-XCAM
| D415
| D435
| ZED
| ZED Mini
| MYNTEYE S1030-IR
| ZiVID 3D camera
| N30/N35
| X30/X36
| Karmin2
| VIVE Pro VR headset
| Bumblebee XB3
| Tara
|-
|-
!style='text-align:left;'|Released
!style='text-align:left;'|Released
| 2018
| 2018
| Jan 2018
| 2015-2018
| Jan 2018
|-
| Jun 2016?
!style='text-align:left;'|Depth sensing technology
| Nov 2017
|  
| 2018
|  
| Apr 2018
* Active IR and projected pattern variations '''or'''
| Dec 2015
* SLAM variations
| Nov 2017
|-
| Nov 2017
!style='text-align:left;'| Depth range, m
| Jan 2018?
| <font color='red' size='4'>'''10-5000'''</font>
| pre 2014?
| <font color='red' size='4'>'''0.10-20'''</font>
| Jul 2016
|-
|-
!colspan='20' style='text-align:left;color:royalblue;'| STEREO SETUP
!style='text-align:left;' valign='top'| Depth accuracy
|valign='top'|
* 1% at 100m
* 5% at 500m
* 10% at 1000m
* 20% at 2000m
|  
* Some do not have information
* Passive systems (no IR), best:
** 1.5% at 10m
** 17.5% at 100m
* Active systems, best (ZiVID):
** 0.1mm @ 0.6m but the range is 0.6-1.1m
* HTC VIVE: 5% @ 2m (info by StereoLabs)
* ZED Mini by StereoLabs:
** 1% at 1m
** 9% at 10m
|-
|-
!style='text-align:left;'| Number of image sensors
!style='text-align:left;'| Number of image sensors
| 4 (square)
| 4 (square)
| 2
| 1-2
| 2
| 2
| 2
| 2
| 1
| 2
| 2
| 2
| 2
| 2
| 2
|-
|-
!style='text-align:left;'|Stereo baseline, mm
!style='text-align:left;'|Stereo baseline, mm
| 250
| 250 (diagonal)
| ?
| from single lens to 63-250
| ?
| 120
| 63
| 120
| ?
| ?
| 200, 400
| 100, 250
| ~65?
| 120, 240
| ?
|-
|-
!style='text-align:left;'|Depth range, m
!style='text-align:left;'| IR projectors
| 10-5000
| no
| 0.16-10+
| some have, some don't
| 0.105-10+
| 0.5-20
| 0.15-12
| 1-20
| 0.6-1.1
| <3
| ?
| 250mm: 1.5%@10m, 17.5%@100m
| 3%@1m, 5%@2m
| link
| 0.5-3
|-
|-
|}
|}

Revision as of 19:04, 5 October 2018

Links

Comparison table

3D Vision System Elphel MNC393-XCAM Reviewed competing products
Released 2018 2015-2018
Depth sensing technology
  • Active IR and projected pattern variations or
  • SLAM variations
Depth range, m 10-5000 0.10-20
Depth accuracy
  • 1% at 100m
  • 5% at 500m
  • 10% at 1000m
  • 20% at 2000m
  • Some do not have information
  • Passive systems (no IR), best:
    • 1.5% at 10m
    • 17.5% at 100m
  • Active systems, best (ZiVID):
    • 0.1mm @ 0.6m but the range is 0.6-1.1m
  • HTC VIVE: 5% @ 2m (info by StereoLabs)
  • ZED Mini by StereoLabs:
    • 1% at 1m
    • 9% at 10m
Number of image sensors 4 (square) 1-2
Stereo baseline, mm 250 (diagonal) from single lens to 63-250
IR projectors no some have, some don't
Retrieved from "https://wiki.elphel.com/index.php?title=Stereo_Vision_Systems&oldid=14729"