Talk:10349: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
No problem, we can use black plex. | No problem, we can use black plex. | ||
--[[User:Dimon|dimon]] 21:11, 16 October 2007 (CDT) | --[[User:Dimon|dimon]] 21:11, 16 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
Will the RS323 socket fit in the camera on top of both 10353 & 10349 ? | |||
--[[User:Polto|Polto]] 03:45, 1 November 2007 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 02:46, 1 November 2007
About the plex panel for developer case: why do it transparent ? Is where a special reason ? It's not very good for image quality to have light inside the case. --Polto 11:36, 14 October 2007 (GMT)
Transparent? Why? Is it written anywhere?--Andrey.filippov 16:29, 14 October 2007 (CDT)
Yep, in 10349#Body_of_camera_for_developers --Polto 08:55, 15 October 2007 (GMT)
I looked at the images only, did not read the text. You are right there is no sense to have transparent cover - it will allow stray light to reach the sensor.--Andrey.filippov 03:10, 15 October 2007 (CDT)
No problem, we can use black plex. --dimon 21:11, 16 October 2007 (CDT)
Will the RS323 socket fit in the camera on top of both 10353 & 10349 ?
--Polto 03:45, 1 November 2007 (GMT)