Difference between revisions of "Talk:10349"
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
That is my comment. --[[User:Dimon|dimon]] 22:17, 31 October 2007 (CDT) | That is my comment. --[[User:Dimon|dimon]] 22:17, 31 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Are these boards available for purchase or testing? --[[User:Ekratzer|Ekratzer]] 15:51, 12 November 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 13:51, 12 November 2007
About the plex panel for developer case: why do it transparent ? Is where a special reason ? It's not very good for image quality to have light inside the case. --Polto 11:36, 14 October 2007 (GMT)
Transparent? Why? Is it written anywhere?--Andrey.filippov 16:29, 14 October 2007 (CDT)
Yep, in 10349#Body_of_camera_for_developers --Polto 08:55, 15 October 2007 (GMT)
I looked at the images only, did not read the text. You are right there is no sense to have transparent cover - it will allow stray light to reach the sensor.--Andrey.filippov 03:10, 15 October 2007 (CDT)
No problem, we can use black plex. --dimon 21:11, 16 October 2007 (CDT)
Will the RS323 socket fit in the camera on top of both 10353 & 10349 ?
--Polto 03:45, 1 November 2007 (GMT)
Should be yes. I measure distance between PCB of 10349 with 10353 to top of cover on 3D model. This is 11.5 mm. For common socket of RS232 this distance is good.
That is my comment. --dimon 22:17, 31 October 2007 (CDT)
Are these boards available for purchase or testing? --Ekratzer 15:51, 12 November 2007 (CST)
