Difference between revisions of "Talk:10349"
From ElphelWiki
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I looked at the images only, did not read the text. You are right there is no sense to have transparent cover - it will allow stray light to reach the sensor.--[[User:Andrey.filippov|Andrey.filippov]] 03:10, 15 October 2007 (CDT) | I looked at the images only, did not read the text. You are right there is no sense to have transparent cover - it will allow stray light to reach the sensor.--[[User:Andrey.filippov|Andrey.filippov]] 03:10, 15 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | No problem, we can use black plex. | ||
| + | --[[User:Dimon|dimon]] 21:11, 16 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:11, 16 October 2007
About the plex panel for developer case: why do it transparent ? Is where a special reason ? It's not very good for image quality to have light inside the case. --Polto 11:36, 14 October 2007 (GMT)
Transparent? Why? Is it written anywhere?--Andrey.filippov 16:29, 14 October 2007 (CDT)
Yep, in 10349#Body_of_camera_for_developers --Polto 08:55, 15 October 2007 (GMT)
I looked at the images only, did not read the text. You are right there is no sense to have transparent cover - it will allow stray light to reach the sensor.--Andrey.filippov 03:10, 15 October 2007 (CDT)
No problem, we can use black plex. --dimon 21:11, 16 October 2007 (CDT)
