Difference between revisions of "Talk:10359 DWT"

From ElphelWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==2008/11/18==
 +
1. Solved. Datapath is ok now. The mistake was in programming tile's x-sizes and shifts for a large frame (and in tests everithing was correct).
 +
 
==2008/11/13==
 
==2008/11/13==
 
1. Made datapath to/from memory for the tranform (added 2 channels) Currently get a set of 3 frames:
 
1. Made datapath to/from memory for the tranform (added 2 channels) Currently get a set of 3 frames:

Revision as of 07:12, 18 November 2008

2008/11/18

1. Solved. Datapath is ok now. The mistake was in programming tile's x-sizes and shifts for a large frame (and in tests everithing was correct).

2008/11/13

1. Made datapath to/from memory for the tranform (added 2 channels) Currently get a set of 3 frames:

step 1: frame from channel 1 goes directly to 353 and to the memory at the same time.

step 2: line by line frame is read from the memory and is written back to another location line by line: "read_line - write_line - read_line - write_line ..."

step 3: line by line frame is read from the memory.

step 1, direct step 2, 1st SDRAM read step 3, 2nd SDRAM read
Reference img.jpeg
359 first store.jpeg
359 second store.jpeg

Comments:

1. Feels like locations overlap somehow - this should be checked

2. No mistakes in the simulation stage (frames are 1620x4).

2008/07/31

Solved - 1. "right part is lost" - solved - mistake was in ch2_N_fp - line size in pixels

2. Made *.bit - board doesn't see sensors

2008/07/29

1. Simulation: output image is incorrect - right part is lost

2008/07/25

1. adjusted mcontr to read/write blocks to DDR

a. verified and corrected mistakes

TODO: adjust frame size more properly


2008/07/15

mcontr for block read/write is under work.

useful note:

1. SA[24:23]= Bank[1:0]
2. SA[22:10]= Row[12:0]
3. SA[9:0]  = Col[9:0]

4. SA[12:8] - ...

2008/07/08

Basic 1D DWT for the whole frame is done. For each pixel in the Bayer Pattern should be calculated a separate DWT (because the difference can be significant?) - when I calculate mean value between neighbours (e.g., R & G) - the resulting picture is strange.