Talk:10349

About the plex panel for developer case: why do it transparent ? Is where a special reason ? It's not very good for image quality to have light inside the case. --Polto 11:36, 14 October 2007 (GMT)

Transparent? Why? Is it written anywhere?--Andrey.filippov 16:29, 14 October 2007 (CDT)

Yep, in 10349#Body_of_camera_for_developers --Polto 08:55, 15 October 2007 (GMT)

I looked at the images only, did not read the text. You are right there is no sense to have transparent cover - it will allow stray light to reach the sensor.--Andrey.filippov 03:10, 15 October 2007 (CDT)

No problem, we can use black plex. --dimon 21:11, 16 October 2007 (CDT)

Will the RS323 socket fit in the camera on top of both 10353 & 10349 ? --Polto 03:45, 1 November 2007 (GMT)

Should be yes. I measure distance between PCB of 10349 with 10353 to top of cover on 3D model. This is 11.5 mm. For common socket of RS232 this distance is good.

That is my comment. --dimon 22:17, 31 October 2007 (CDT)

Are these boards available for purchase or testing? --Ekratzer 15:51, 12 November 2007 (CST)

Yes, we just do not have our costs (and so the price) ready yet.

Andrey

I am trying to use CF + DMA on 10353 boards. I have tried many CF cards and they work fine under normal PIO modes, but not with DMA, even when tweaking parameters with hdparm. I have also found that some hard drives work with DMA, and some do not, leading me to believe that maybe there is some CF type that will work. Has anybody successfully use CF + DMA on the 353's ETRAX FS?

--Ekratzer 11:41, 28 January 2008 (CST)