Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gentoo embedded"
From ElphelWiki
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I have created a crossdev crisv32-axis-linux-uclibc. Glibc was broken on another point in the middle of compilation. Now I'm trying to actually get a normal program to compile with the toolchain just made. | I have created a crossdev crisv32-axis-linux-uclibc. Glibc was broken on another point in the middle of compilation. Now I'm trying to actually get a normal program to compile with the toolchain just made. | ||
| − | And to answer your question, to get the axis compilation to work is trivial, | + | And to answer your question, to get the axis compilation to work is trivial, I made a hello world with that, but it is not trivial is to compile things with an old GCC ;) So if this works it gives me an uclibc system, I can run the camera from and a cross compiler to make software. And I presume crisv32 is more optimal than cris. |
| − | --[[User:Skinkie|Skinkie]] 13: | + | --[[User:Skinkie|Skinkie]] 13:52, 6 September 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 11:52, 6 September 2008
Why don't you try to make an ebuild for Axis' cris-dist-glibc ?
--Alexandre.Poltorak 13:24, 6 September 2008 (CDT)
I have created a crossdev crisv32-axis-linux-uclibc. Glibc was broken on another point in the middle of compilation. Now I'm trying to actually get a normal program to compile with the toolchain just made. And to answer your question, to get the axis compilation to work is trivial, I made a hello world with that, but it is not trivial is to compile things with an old GCC ;) So if this works it gives me an uclibc system, I can run the camera from and a cross compiler to make software. And I presume crisv32 is more optimal than cris.
--Skinkie 13:52, 6 September 2008 (CDT)
