Difference between revisions of "Talk:Release notes"

From ElphelWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
1) something is not initialized correctly, you need to change parameters to make normal images
 
1) something is not initialized correctly, you need to change parameters to make normal images
 +
 
2) color gains are not sync to frame syncs - chnage in the middle of the frame. Why does it happen - should be synchronized in the i2c controller if not the senor itself
 
2) color gains are not sync to frame syncs - chnage in the middle of the frame. Why does it happen - should be synchronized in the i2c controller if not the senor itself
 +
 
3) several times got camera in the strange state - in the monochrome mode there were some colored bands. Suspect that the jpeg output got out of sync - could be related to something wrong in programming sensors, different latencies (so image size is not what what it was expected to be?)--[[User:Andrey.filippov|Andrey.filippov]] 22:13, 6 April 2009 (CDT)
 
3) several times got camera in the strange state - in the monochrome mode there were some colored bands. Suspect that the jpeg output got out of sync - could be related to something wrong in programming sensors, different latencies (so image size is not what what it was expected to be?)--[[User:Andrey.filippov|Andrey.filippov]] 22:13, 6 April 2009 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 20:57, 6 April 2009

elphel353-8.0.4.2 - while fixing operation with 1.3MPix sensor, I noticed couple problems with both 1.3MPix and 3MPix sensors:

1) something is not initialized correctly, you need to change parameters to make normal images

2) color gains are not sync to frame syncs - chnage in the middle of the frame. Why does it happen - should be synchronized in the i2c controller if not the senor itself

3) several times got camera in the strange state - in the monochrome mode there were some colored bands. Suspect that the jpeg output got out of sync - could be related to something wrong in programming sensors, different latencies (so image size is not what what it was expected to be?)--Andrey.filippov 22:13, 6 April 2009 (CDT)