Difference between revisions of "Talk:Control Panel"

From ElphelWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(The current status)
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 
Add current clock frequencies - response to commands "fpcf -X 0" and "fpcf -X 1"--[[User:Andrey.filippov|Andrey.filippov]] 02:55, 1 February 2008 (CST)
 
Add current clock frequencies - response to commands "fpcf -X 0" and "fpcf -X 1"--[[User:Andrey.filippov|Andrey.filippov]] 02:55, 1 February 2008 (CST)
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
"353 developer's board" is 10353 and we may remove it from board config tabs, it should be the second tab - general configuration. the others 10359 & 10369 (not 369) should not be called "developer" board, it will be usable by end-users.
 +
 +
Why not in the tabs call 10369 - General IO board and the 10359 - Image processing board ? --[[User:Polto|Alexandre.Poltorak]] 19:05, 17 March 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 16:05, 17 March 2008

The current status

The camera's control panel interface is cleaned up, it's mostly minor details that require attention:

  • elphel support email on the page
  • verification of ip and other settings before they are set
  • a disclaimer

Siraf 17:04, 28 January 2008 (CST)

  • Fix Camera reboot function
  • Create restart network daemon function
  • Make all fields collapsible/re-collapsible
  • Create a copy-to-clipboard function for the camera summary
  • Create notification pages for the change network settings functions
  • Clean up some of the output information
  • Clean up visual styles in general

Saint17 17:21, 28 January 2008 (CST)

Please add a link the the software tarball in the camera (docs/elphel353-*.tar.gz), so user not only can see the current software version but actually download the tarball--Andrey.filippov 17:58, 28 January 2008 (CST)

Add current clock frequencies - response to commands "fpcf -X 0" and "fpcf -X 1"--Andrey.filippov 02:55, 1 February 2008 (CST)


"353 developer's board" is 10353 and we may remove it from board config tabs, it should be the second tab - general configuration. the others 10359 & 10369 (not 369) should not be called "developer" board, it will be usable by end-users.

Why not in the tabs call 10369 - General IO board and the 10359 - Image processing board ? --Alexandre.Poltorak 19:05, 17 March 2008 (CDT)