Difference between revisions of "Talk:Control Panel"
(→The current status) |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Add current clock frequencies - response to commands "fpcf -X 0" and "fpcf -X 1"--[[User:Andrey.filippov|Andrey.filippov]] 02:55, 1 February 2008 (CST) | Add current clock frequencies - response to commands "fpcf -X 0" and "fpcf -X 1"--[[User:Andrey.filippov|Andrey.filippov]] 02:55, 1 February 2008 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | "353 developer's board" is 10353 and we may remove it from board config tabs, it should be the second tab - general configuration. the others 10359 & 10369 (not 369) should not be called "developer" board, it will be usable by end-users. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Why not in the tabs call 10369 - General IO board and the 10359 - Image processing board ? --[[User:Polto|Alexandre.Poltorak]] 19:05, 17 March 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 16:05, 17 March 2008
The current status
The camera's control panel interface is cleaned up, it's mostly minor details that require attention:
- elphel support email on the page
- verification of ip and other settings before they are set
- a disclaimer
Siraf 17:04, 28 January 2008 (CST)
- Fix Camera reboot function
- Create restart network daemon function
- Make all fields collapsible/re-collapsible
- Create a copy-to-clipboard function for the camera summary
- Create notification pages for the change network settings functions
- Clean up some of the output information
- Clean up visual styles in general
Saint17 17:21, 28 January 2008 (CST)
Please add a link the the software tarball in the camera (docs/elphel353-*.tar.gz), so user not only can see the current software version but actually download the tarball--Andrey.filippov 17:58, 28 January 2008 (CST)
Add current clock frequencies - response to commands "fpcf -X 0" and "fpcf -X 1"--Andrey.filippov 02:55, 1 February 2008 (CST)
"353 developer's board" is 10353 and we may remove it from board config tabs, it should be the second tab - general configuration. the others 10359 & 10369 (not 369) should not be called "developer" board, it will be usable by end-users.
Why not in the tabs call 10369 - General IO board and the 10359 - Image processing board ? --Alexandre.Poltorak 19:05, 17 March 2008 (CDT)