Talk:353 legacy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
- should we continue to include DVR in the camera or is it better to do a .deb package and have it pre-installed on our LiveDVD ? | - should we continue to include DVR in the camera or is it better to do a .deb package and have it pre-installed on our LiveDVD ? | ||
- switch from ElphelOgm to ElphelSrv | - switch from ElphelOgm to ElphelSrv | ||
- select the place to write from DVR | - select the place to write from DVR | ||
LiveDVD todo list: | LiveDVD todo list: | ||
- what to do if does not get DHCP? | - what to do if does not get DHCP? | ||
- what to do about multiple network interfaces ? (should route multicast truth the good one) | - what to do about multiple network interfaces ? (should route multicast truth the good one) | ||
- generate .deb packages for debian/ubuntu | - generate .deb packages for debian/ubuntu | ||
- see if we need to use and if yes, how? the unionfs? | - see if we need to use and if yes, how? the unionfs? | ||
Revision as of 21:57, 24 May 2007
Known bugs:
- The sensor does not change FPS when you reduce resolution.
DVR redesign question:
- should we continue to include DVR in the camera or is it better to do a .deb package and have it pre-installed on our LiveDVD ?
- switch from ElphelOgm to ElphelSrv
- select the place to write from DVR
LiveDVD todo list:
- what to do if does not get DHCP?
- what to do about multiple network interfaces ? (should route multicast truth the good one)
- generate .deb packages for debian/ubuntu
- see if we need to use and if yes, how? the unionfs?